Government will apologise for 'pervasive racism' as report finds 350,000 black and Asian troops who died fighting for the British Empire were not buried or commemorated in same way as their white comrades

  • Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC) established in 1917 to commemorate all soldiers equally
  • But researchers found it regularly fell short of this goal when it came to troops recruited from the Empire
  • Report says 350,000 African and Middle Eastern casualties may not have been named on memorials at all
  • Three million British colonial and white dominion subjects served in WWI, and upwards of 500,000 perished Ministers are set to apologise today after a report found as many as 350,000 black and Asian troops who died fighting for the British Empire during World War One were not commemorated in the same way as their white comrades due to 'pervasive racism'.

    The Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC) was established in 1917 under the principle that all soldiers should be commemorated with a headstone or by their names being engraved on a memorial, but researchers found it regularly fell short of this goal when it came to non-white troops recruited from the Empire. 

    All fallen UK military personnel received this honour, but the report estimates that between 45,000 and 54,000 casualties (predominantly Indian, East African, West African, Egyptian and Somali personnel) did not. 

    For some, rather than marking their graves individually, as would have been the case in Europe, these men were commemorated collectively on memorials. For others who were missing, their names were recorded in registers rather than in stone. 

    A further 116,000 WWI casualties (predominantly, but not exclusively, East African and Egyptian personnel) – but potentially as many as 350,000 – were not commemorated by name or possibly not commemorated at all, out of the around 500,000 colonial and white dominion troops who died during the conflict. 

    Most of these men were commemorated by memorials that did not carry their names – in part because the military or colonial authorities never provided their names. In the words of one colonial official: 'The average native would not understand or appreciate a headstone.'  

    Today the historian Professor David Olusoga said the CWGC, under its previous leadership, 'chose to ignore' research published in 2012 which pointed to these disparities. 'This has not been a secret,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.  The Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC) said it 'apologised unreservedly' for black and Asian soldiers being denied graves. Pictured is a CWGC cemetery in the Somme, France

    The Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC) said it 'apologised unreservedly' for black and Asian soldiers being denied graves. Pictured is a CWGC cemetery in the Somme, France In its response to the report, the CWGC says it 'acknowledges that the Commission failed to fully carry out its responsibilities at the time and accepts the findings and failings identified in this report and we apologise unreservedly for them'. 

    The investigation found that the failure to properly commemorate the individuals was 'influenced by a scarcity of information, errors inherited from other organisations and the opinions of colonial administrators'.

    'Underpinning all these decisions, however, were the entrenched prejudices, preconceptions and pervasive racism of contemporary imperial attitudes,' it added.

    'The average native would not understand or appreciate a headstone' 

    One example given is based on communications in 1923 between F.G. Guggisberg, the governor of the Gold Coast colony, now Ghana, and Arthur Browne, from the Commonwealth War Graves Commission.

    At a meeting in London, it was said that the governor said 'the average native of the Gold Coast would not understand or appreciate a headstone' as he argued for collective memorials.

    A response from Arthur Browne showed 'what he may have considered foresight, but one that was explicitly framed by contemporary racial prejudice', according to the report.

    He had said: 'In perhaps two or three hundred years' time, when the native population had reached a higher stage of civilisation, they might then be glad to see that headstones had been erected on the native graves and that the native soldiers had received precisely the same treatment as their white comrades.' 

    One example given is based on communications in 1923 between F.G. Guggisberg, the governor of the Gold Coast colony, now Ghana, and Arthur Browne, from the Commonwealth War Graves Commission.

    At a meeting in London, it was said that the governor said 'the average native of the Gold Coast would not understand or appreciate a headstone' as he argued for collective memorials.

    A response from Arthur Browne showed 'what he may have considered foresight, but one that was explicitly framed by contemporary racial prejudice', according to the report.

    He had said: 'In perhaps two or three hundred years' time, when the native population had reached a higher stage of civilisation, they might then be glad to see that headstones had been erected on the native graves and that the native soldiers had received precisely the same treatment as their white comrades.' 

    The special committee behind the investigation was established by the CWGC - originally called the Imperial War Graves Commission - in 2019 after a critical documentary on the issue, titled Unremembered and presented by Labour MP David Lammy.

    Mr Lammy discovered that the graves of African soldiers in Tanzania were being abandoned while the graves of European officers were still being tended.

    He also visited the CWGC cemetery in Voi, southern Kenya, where he found that the remains of Africans who died fighting for Britain were buried in unmarked graves in scrubland outside the cemetery boundaries - in contrast to the immaculate graves of native Britons. 

    Last night the commission said: 'The report highlights that, in certain circumstances, those principles so rigidly adhered to for all who fell in Europe were applied inconsistently or abandoned in the more distant corners of the globe when applied to the non-European war dead of the British Empire, in the immediate aftermath of World War One.

    'The commissioners acknowledge that this was not right then and must not be allowed to remain unaddressed now. Those identified in the special committee's report deserve to be remembered as much today as they did 100 years ago.'  

    The findings of the report are due to be announced by Defence Secretary Ben Wallace in the House of Commons.

    The historian Professor David Olusoga said the failure to properly commemorate potentially hundreds of thousands of predominantly black and Asian service personnel who died fighting for the British Empire is 'one of the biggest scandals I've ever come across as an historian'.

    The CWGC cemetery in Voi, southern Kenya, which Labour MP David Lammy visited for a 2019 documentary about the unequal treatment of Britain's war dead

    The CWGC cemetery in Voi, southern Kenya, which Labour MP David Lammy visited for a 2019 documentary about the unequal treatment of Britain's war dead 

    Beyond the perimeter fence, in scrubland, are the graves of Africans who served Britain in the East Africa Corps, where they are buried in unmarked graves

    Beyond the perimeter fence, in scrubland, are the graves of Africans who served Britain in the East Africa Corps, where they are buried in unmarked graves

    Prof Olusoga, whose television company produced the documentary Unremembered: Britain's Forgotten War Heroes, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'These are men who died fighting for Britain in the most appalling war Britain's ever faced, the war that killed more British soldiers and more Commonwealth soldiers than any conflict in history.

    'It is a war that deeply changed our culture and part of the impact of the First World War was the power of the way those who fell were memorialised.

    'When it came to men who were black and brown and Asian and African, it is not equal, particularly the Africans who have been treated in a way that is, as I said, it's apartheid in death.

    'It is an absolute scandal. It is one of the biggest scandals I've ever come across as an historian, but the biggest scandal is that this was known years ago.' 

    Prof Olusoga said the Commonwealth War Graves Commission, under its previous leadership, 'chose to ignore' the work of Professor Michele Barrett.

    Prof Olusoga said he first read her research papers back in 2012, adding: 'This information was in my book The World's War in 2014 and this has not been a secret.

    'This information has been known. It's been known to historians. It's been known to the Commonwealth War Graves Commission.

    'I'm very pleased that this report has come out and I look forward to an acknowledgement and an apology today.

    'But people knew about this. This is not something that's been uncovered by this report. It's being acknowledged by this report. Michele's work uncovered this a decade ago.'

    Soldiers from the British Empire played a vital role during WWI and WWII. Pictured are Indian cavalry in the Somme in 1916

    Soldiers from the British Empire played a vital role during WWI and WWII. Pictured are Indian cavalry in the Somme in 1916

    He said the CWGC's initial response to the documentary was not to launch a committee but instead was 'annoyance and anger'.

    He added: 'The first attempt to put a committee together excluded Professor Barrett, and I know that because they invited me to sit on it and not her.

    'I'm very pleased this is all happening but it has been somewhat reluctant, it has been somewhat dragged down to the Commonwealth War Graves Commission.' 

    In a statement CWGC director general Claire Horton said: 'The events of a century ago were wrong then and are wrong now.

    'We recognise the wrongs of the past and are deeply sorry and will be acting immediately to correct them.' 

    The CWGC report calls on more research to identify the names of unidentified Empire war dead so they can be commemorated on memorials, and context panels on existing ones acknowledging that some names are missing. 

    However, the report accepts the passage of time means it will be impossible to locate the vast majority of men who were buried in unmarked graves. 

No comments:

Powered by Blogger.