PHOTO FLOP Why did photo agencies issue ‘kill notices’ on Princess Kate’s Mother’s Day picture?

PICTURE agencies have issued 'kill notices' on Princess Kate's Mother's Day picture.

The photo showed Kate, 42, sitting on a chair and smiling while surrounded by Prince George, 10 Princess Charlotte, 8, and Prince Louis, 5, with beaming smiles.

Kensington Palace is under pressure to respond to Princess Kate's Mother's Day photo
7
Kensington Palace is under pressure to respond to Princess Kate's Mother's Day photo
Fans pointed out a number of 'editing fails' after the image of Kate was released
7
Fans pointed out a number of 'editing fails' after the image of Kate was released
Fans have argued there are 'editing fails' in the pic - including Princess Charlotte's 'vanishing sleeve' and Princess Kate not wearing her wedding ring
7
Fans have argued there are 'editing fails' in the pic - including Princess Charlotte's 'vanishing sleeve' and Princess Kate not wearing her wedding ring
Reuters issued a kill notice after a 'publication review'
7
Reuters issued a kill notice after a 'publication review'Credit: Reuters
AP ordered a kill notification after they appeared to find the 'source has manipulated the image'
7
AP ordered a kill notification after they appeared to find the 'source has manipulated the image'

Kensington Palace said the picture had been taken by Prince William, 41, last week.

It was published on the royal couple’s official social media pages on Sunday before issuing it to select press agencies for syndication, as is typical for images distributed by the royals.

However, the image sparked an online frenzy after royal fans claimed the picture was edited.

Kensington Palace is now under pressure to respond to the accusations of manipulation.News agencies ordered a "kill notice" on the picture late Sunday night.

The removal orders were sent after "manipulation" on the image was discovered.

AP's order said the reason for killing the story was: "At closer inspection it appears that the source has manipulated the image."

The order then directs those who have used the photo to remove it from all platforms, including social.

Agence France-Press ordered the "mandatory kill" due to an "editorial issue" and directed that the image may no longer be used.

Reuters said the photo “has been withdrawn following a post publication review.” 

Getty Images said: “For editorial reasons, please remove the following image(s) from your system and do not use in any manner.” 

Getty said its picture desk "identified a problematic image" provided by the palace and removed it from its site "in accordance with our editorial policy."

Each of the news agencies have their own editorial guidelines which govern how they treat images.

AP says that pictures "must always tell the truth" and that it does not alter or manipulate the content of a photograph in any way.

Its guidelines say: "The content of a photograph must not be altered in PhotoShop or by any other means. No element should be digitally added to or subtracted from any photograph." 

However, AP says minor adjustments are allowed, they include cropping, colour adjustments, and light adjustments.

Kate captioned the snap: "Thank you for your kind wishes and continued support over the last two months.

"Wishing everyone a Happy Mother’s Day. C"

The Sun's Royal Photographer Arthur Edwards has blasted the "spoiling" of the photograph by editing.

He said: "To me it wasn't about the sleeve, it's about the fact that Catherine looked so good and the smiles on the children.

"It's just a lovely family photograph. I'd have been proud to take that photograph and I'm sorry it's been spoiled by this stupid photo editing. It's not even been done properly.

"My view is the agencies in the US are so fussy we can't even take the red eye out, we mustn't touch it.

"There rules are their rules. I'm so pleased the picture is still being run because it shows Catherine looks so well."

The original X post now has a warning on it that reads: "Major news agencies, including the Associated Press, Getty Images, and Reuters, note inconsistencies that suggest digital alteration by Kensington Palace."

The "manipulated" image comes as rumours about Kate's health were sparked after William missed a memorial service last week.

He had been expected to perform a reading, but pulled out due to a "personal matter".Kate had only been spotted once since her surgery, in the passenger seat of a black Audi as mum Carole, 69, drove her near Windsor Castle.

She was wearing sunglasses and appeared to be smiling slightly.

Timeline of Royal health battles

HERE is a date-by-date rundown of the health battles to have struck the Royals this year:

JANUARY 16: Kate is admitted to the London Clinic for abdominal surgery.

JAN 17: It is announced that the King is to have treatment for a benign enlarged prostate.

JAN 18: William spends time at Kate’s bedside.

JAN 19: The King flies back from Scotland with the Queen.

JAN 21: It is announced Sarah, Duchess of York, has malignant melanoma, a skin cancer.

JAN 23: Kate’s hospital stay passes one week. JAN 26: The King is admitted to the London Clinic for treatment.

JAN 29: The King is discharged from hospital. Kate leaves the same day.

JAN 31: Queen Camilla announces that the King is “getting on, doing his best”.

FEBRUARY 5: Buckingham Palace announces the King has cancer, but not of the prostate, and will not carry out public-facing duties.

FEB 18: The King appears in good spirits as he attends a Sunday church service in the grounds of Sandringham.

FEB 23: The King filmed crying and chuckling while opening some of the 7,000 cards from well-wishers.

FEB 27: Prince William pulls out of service last-minute due to 'personal matter', sparking wave of unfounded conspiracy theories about Kate's health.

MARCH 4: Kate Middleton pictured in the car with mum Carole on the Windsor estate

Fans said it was odd that Kate's hand was fuzzed
7
Fans said it was odd that Kate's hand was fuzzed
Kate has not been seen in public since her abdominal surgery in January
7
Kate has not been seen in public since her abdominal surgery in January

No comments:

Powered by Blogger.