Scientists rebel over Freedom Day: More than 1,200 experts and doctors attack No10 for 'criminal' plan of achieving herd immunity through mass infection - as Britain's daily deaths hit three-month high of 50 and cases jump by a quarter in a week to 36,660

  • Chief Secretary to the Treasury Steve Barclay says 'no one knows' how effective vaccines will be in the winter 
  • Professor Calum Semple says 'winter bump' will be a mixture of Covid and other respiratory viruses 
  • He says curbs including mask wearing may have to be reintroduced but a full-scale lockdown is unlikely 
  • Boris Johnson last night announced most Covid restrictions will be eased next Monday on 'Freedom Day' More than 1,200 leading scientists are rebelling against No10's decision to push ahead with 'Freedom Day' on Monday, slamming the move as 'criminal' and branding the Government's return to pursuing herd immunity 'unethical'. 

    A coalition of experts and doctors signed a letter in the medical journal The Lancet critiquing Boris Johnson's 'unscientific' decision last night, amid soaring Covid infection numbers and rising hospitalisations and deaths. 

    The group — which includes four prominent SAGE experts — claimed millions more adults need to be double-vaccinated before restrictions can be eased to be safe. It came as Britain today recorded 50 Covid deaths for the first time since April, while cases showed no sign of slowing down, jumping by a quarter in a week to another six-month high with 36,660 positive tests.

    Among the signatories are David Cameron's former Chief Scientific Adviser Sir David King, as well as BMA council chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul and Professor Christina Pagel, a mathematician at University College London and Independent SAGE member.

    The Prime Minister confirmed that all restrictions would be dropped next week. However, No10 has dropped all mention of the final stage of its roadmap being 'irreversible', with one minister today hinting that the drastic action could be adopted once again this winter.

    SAGE modelling shows pushing the button next week could result in between 1,000 and 2,000 daily hospital admissions and 200 deaths. But worst-case projections show that hospitalisations could breach 25,000 and deaths 3,000 — which would dwarf previous peaks. 

    It came amid a storm of anger at the Government, with Liberal Democrat MP Layla Moran, chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Coronavirus, described No10's approach as 'reckless' and Professor Adrian Hayday, an immunobiologist at King’s College London, told MPs in the group opening up on July 19 will cause 'unnecessary and inappropriate self-inflicted harm'.

    And Dr Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of the Lancet, said he was shocked by No10's chief medical officer Professor Chris Whitty and chief scientific scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance for not 'being more public about their concerns'. 

    Dr Horton accused Professor Whitty of 'wilfully misrepresenting scientific opinion across the country'. Professor Whitty previously voiced his support for the July 19 date in order to prevent a larger winter wave. 

    Modelling by SAGE released yesterday suggests it is realistic to expect between 100 to 200 daily fatalities and 1,000 to 2,000 hospital admissions at the worst of the current outbreak this autumn, following the unlocking on July 19, with up to 4,800 daily admissions as an upper bracket predicted by one model (black shaded curve)

    Modelling by SAGE released yesterday suggests it is realistic to expect between 100 to 200 daily fatalities and 1,000 to 2,000 hospital admissions at the worst of the current outbreak this autumn, following the unlocking on July 19, with up to 4,800 daily admissions as an upper bracket predicted by one model (black shaded curve)Imperial's modelling was based on low (light blue), high (dark blue) and central (blue) R rate changes after July 19. Left is optimistic vaccine efficacy, central is default and right is pessimistic. The team at Imperial said there could be more than 30,000 Covid deaths and 260,000 hospital admissions with the virus over the next year under its central assumption

    Imperial's modelling was based on low (light blue), high (dark blue) and central (blue) R rate changes after July 19. Left is optimistic vaccine efficacy, central is default and right is pessimistic. The team at Imperial said there could be more than 30,000 Covid deaths and 260,000 hospital admissions with the virus over the next year under its central assumption

    DAILY HOSPITALISATIONS: SAGE expects there to be between 1,000 and 2,000 admissions at the peak this autumn, with its most central estimate shown in light blue. However, the group says its modelling is highly uncertain and depends on how fast people ditch personal precautions. For this reason the confidence intervals suggest there could be more than 3,000 daily admissions

    DAILY HOSPITALISATIONS: SAGE expects there to be between 1,000 and 2,000 admissions at the peak this autumn, with its most central estimate shown in light blue. However, the group says its modelling is highly uncertain and depends on how fast people ditch personal precautions. For this reason the confidence intervals suggest there could be more than 3,000 daily admissions

    COVID DEATHS: SAGE modelled five different scenarios after July based on how quickly people stop social distancing and following basic Covid measures. The worst-case scenario (in purple) would see people go back to pre-pandemic normal within a month and could lead to more than 500 deaths per day in October. A more gradual relaxation would see deaths remain in the 100 to 200 range at the peak (shown in light blue, dark blue and red)

    COVID DEATHS: SAGE modelled five different scenarios after July based on how quickly people stop social distancing and following basic Covid measures. The worst-case scenario (in purple) would see people go back to pre-pandemic normal within a month and could lead to more than 500 deaths per day in October. A more gradual relaxation would see deaths remain in the 100 to 200 range at the peak (shown in light blue, dark blue and red)

    WHO ARE THE MOST HIGH PROFILE SIGNATORIES?

    Sir David King

    Sir David King

    Sir David King

    Former chief scientific adviser 

    Sir David was the UK Government’s most senior scientific adviser from October 2000 to 31 December 2007.

    He is the director of research at the Department of Chemistry at Cambridge University.

    Sir David also chairs the Independent SAGE group, unaffiliated to government, that publishes advice aimed toward the UK government regarding the Covid pandemic.

    Sir David and the group have been highly critical of the Government's handling of the crisis. 

    Dr Chaand Nagpaul

    Dr Chaand Nagpaul

    Dr Chaand Nagpaul

    Chairman of the British Medical Association (BMA) Council. 

    Dr Nagpaul is a GP in Stanmore, North London, and was elected as chair of the influential trade union for doctors in July 2017.

    He previously slammed No10 for shortening the dosing gap between Covid vaccines.

    It later transpired that a longer dosing regimen provided better protection.  

    Professor Susan Michie

    Professor Susan Michie

    Professor Susan Michie

    SAGE member and professor of health psychology at University College London 

    Professor Michie is a senior member of the SAGE behavioural subgroup SPI-B.

    She has been a fervent Communist since 1978 and has previously called for social distancing and wearing face masks should stay forever.

    Professor Stephen Reicher 

    Dr Richard Horton

    Dr Richard Horton

    SAGE member and social psychologist at the University of St Andrews 

    Professor Reicher is another senior member of SPI-B.

    He has previously criticised the Government for allowing the Cummings row to undermine public trust.

    Professor Robert West 

    Robert West

    Robert West

    SAGE member and health psychologist at University College London

    Professor West is also a Spi-B member and prominent psychologist in University College London's Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare.

    He has previously criticised the Government for allowing 70,000 deaths a year from smoking. 

    Professor Tolullah Oni  

    SAGE member and urban epidemiologist

    Professor Oni  is a Nigerian urban epidemiologist at the Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit at the University of Cambridge. She is a NextEinstein Forum Fellow and World Economic Forum Young Global Leader.

    Dr Richard Horton

    Dr Richard Horton

    Dr Richard Horton

    Editor of The Lancet

    Dr Horton joined the prestigious medical journal in 1990 and was appointed editor-in-chief five years later.

    Since the pandemic began he has accused ministers and their advisers of failing to act properly or quickly enough. 

    In another day of coronavirus chaos:

    • Researchers said Covid could one day be treated by 'chopping' the virus up using pioneering gene-editing technology;
    • Jacob Rees-Mogg said he will not be wearing a face covering at Parliament when the requirement is lifted, stating that people who have received both jabs of the vaccine have already done their 'societal bit';
    • Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford began studying whether or not modifying their vaccines can reduce or eliminate the risk of rare, deadly blood clots;
    • Fears mounted over a 'pingdemic' today as it emerged one in five hospitality workers are self-isolating and a record 830,000 children missed school for Covid-related reasons last week;
    • 'Freedom Day' plans revealed the Test, Trace & Isolate system is set to stay until at least next year despite alarm over rising numbers of healthy people being doomed to house arrest;
    • Government data showed more than a quarter of extremely vulnerable people in England are still shielding despite official guidance to do so dropping in April;
    • Business called for urgent clarity over guidance on mask-wearing, social distancing, work from home and so-called vaccine passports before legal restrictions are axed on July 19.

    Boris Johnson last night announced most Covid restrictions will be eased next Monday — but he also warned that restrictions could return as soon as September if new freedoms are abused. 

    Speaking at last night's Downing Street press conference, the Prime Minister dropped his claim that the unlocking would be 'irreversible' and called for continued mask-wearing in busy indoor settings such as trains, supermarkets and cinemas. 

    Modelling by SAGE yesterday suggested there could be up to 4,800 daily Covid admissions this summer if the UK rushed back to normality next week.

    But the panel of leading scientists believes the nation will act cautiously, which would see daily fatalities peak this autumn at somewhere between the 100 and 200 mark and admissions stay in the region of 1,000 to 2,000. 

    Worst-case projections — based on a whole host of factors that could go wrong in the next few months — warn of more than 25,000 daily hospital admissions and 3,000 deaths. 

    The Lancet letter's 1,246 signatories said the Government's decision to open up before vaccinating children and choosing herd immunity via natural infection rather than through jabs is a 'terrible mistake'.

    It came after a group of 120 scientists signed a similar letter in the same publication critiquing the Government's approach. 

    The group’s statement today said: ‘The Prime Minister’s statement today leaves little doubt that the government’s latest pandemic plan involves exposing millions of people to acute and long-term impacts of mass infection. We believe it is a terrible mistake.’

    It says that it will put ‘intense pressure on struggling healthcare services’ and will lead to ‘many avoidable deaths and long-term illness’, placing at risk children and the clinically vulnerable and immunosuppressed.

    The statement continued: ‘A strategy that chooses mass infection in children and young people now as a way to protect the vulnerable in winter, instead of taking the time to vaccinate our young is unethical and unscientific.’ 

    The group includes the lead author of the Lancet memo, clinical epidemiologist Dr Deepti Gurdasani, a senior lecturer in machine learning at Queen Mary University, Professor Trish Greenhalgh of Oxford University, as well as Professor Christina Pagel of University College London and Professor Martin McKee of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, both of whom are members of Independent SAGE.   

    Dr Helen Salisbury, a GP, lecturer at Oxford University and columnist for the BMJ, said: ’I cannot understand why the government would opt to do herd immunity viral infection when they could do herd immunity by vaccination. 

    'I think it's criminal.’

    Profesor Pagel added: ‘The government says it isn't [following a herd immunity strategy], but at the same time they've said they're willing to live with potentially a few more million infections just before autumn. 

    'I don’t know why people aren’t talking about it more but it’s pretty clear that’s what the decision is.’

    And Dr Gurdasani said: ‘I think people are nervous about using the term herd immunity through infection because they feel unsure about the intentionality of the government, but if it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, it is a duck, and that they are going for herd immunity strategy is very clear from their modeling.’ 

    She added: ‘I think we will look back and see this as perhaps the darkest day for UK science.’

    Meanwhile, Dr Horton slammed Professor Whitty for failing to represent the scientific community's viewpoint. 

    He said he was ‘very shocked that the government’s medical and scientific advisors are not being more public about their concerns'.

    Dr Horton said: 'The faux deference that you saw from both of them to the prime minister in trying to shore up his decision making, I thought, was an abdication of their independent role as government advisors.’

    He also said the CMO’s statement that there was ‘widespread agreement across the scientific community’ was categorically untrue.

    Dr Horton said: ‘I'm afraid I have to conclude that the chief medical officer is wilfully misrepresenting scientific opinion across the country, and that is extraordinary to observe.’

    Chief Secretary to the Treasury Steve Barclay today said 'no one knows' how effective vaccines will be in the winter, meaning some measure could be put back in place
    Professor Calum Semple, a paediatrician at the University of Liverpool and SAGE adviser, said the 'winter bump' will be a mixture of Covid and all the other 'respiratory viruses that we didn't experience in the last year or so'

    Chief Secretary to the Treasury Steve Barclay (left) today said 'no one knows' how effective vaccines will be in the winter, meaning some restrictions could be put back in place. Professor Calum Semple (right), a paediatrician at the University of Liverpool and SAGE adviser, said the 'winter bump' will be a mixture of Covid and all the other 'respiratory viruses that we didn't experience in the last year or so'Covid deaths jumped 35.1 per cent in a week today to their highest total since April 9, when 60 people died with the virus.

    Some 36,660 cases were recorded today — a rise of 27.4 per cent on last Tuesday's figure and the highest daily total since January 22, at the tail end of the winter peak. 

    And hospitalisation jumped another 38.9 per cent in a week to 564 last Wednesday — the latest date data is available for. 

    But in another sign of the Government's changing tune on whether restrictions will be gone for good after next week, minister Steve Barclay said 'no one knows' how effective vaccines will be in the winter, meaning some measures may need to be reintroduced. 

    His comments came despite one of SAGE's own advisers admitted he doesn't see No10 needing to resort to drastic lockdowns again at the end of the year.

    We've enough 'Freedom' ALREADY: Anxious Britons vow to avoid pubs and restaurants after July 19 

    People in England have admitted they are unwilling to enjoy the freedoms set to be restored next week, as new polling shows four in 10 adults support compulsory face masks in public indefinitely while a third of workers say they are 'uncomfortable' with returning to the office. 

    A survey conducted by Ipsos Mori found that a quarter of people would like nightclubs and casinos to remain shut after the pandemic, while nearly a fifth support a permanent 10pm curfew.

    Around a third of the 1,025 adults aged 16-75 interviewed on July 2 and 3 also said they would support permanent social distancing in theatres, pubs and sports grounds, while 35 per cent said they would support mandatory 10-day quarantines for people returning from abroad forever.

    Thirty-six per cent of those polled said they would support compulsory QR scanning upon entering hospitality venues, while 40 per cent said they support mask mandates in shops and on public transport. More than 45 per cent of adults only the vaccinated to ever travel abroad again. 

    Rail and bus companies have said coverings will not be compulsory when restrictions are lifted next week, with a spokesman for the Rail Delivery Group announcing that railway travel is 'low risk'.

    But the Confederation of Passenger Transport, which represents the bus and coach industry, has called for 'clear guidance for operators and customers', while Labour mayors Sadiq Khan and Andy Burnham urged the Government to extend the mask mandate beyond July 19.

    A petition urging Sajid Javid to retain the mask mandate on public transport has already received more than 120,000 signatures from people who claim: 'Masks don't just protect the wearer, they protect the people nearby, so even if transport workers continue to wear masks and others don't it puts them at risk.'  

     

    Professor Calum Semple, a paediatrician at Liverpool University, warned of a 'miserable winter' ahead because of the mix of Covid with flu and other 'respiratory viruses that we didn't experience in the last year or so'. 

    However, he confessed that he doesn't 'foresee the lockdowns or the school suspensions that we've seen' and that curbs including mask-wearing could be reintroduced in order to contain any winter wave

    Chief secretary to the Treasury Mr Barclay hinted the lifting of restrictions next week could be reversed if the winter peak is as bad as some experts have suggested. 

    He told Sky News: 'We have been cautious in order to seek for [lockdown easing] to be irreversible. One never knows what [the situation] will be in the winter. The vaccine has provided that wall.

    'An extra 7million vaccines have been delivered as a result of the extra four weeks [by delaying the original Freedom Day that was scheduled for June 21].

    'And that is why we have taken that extra time but we need to learn to live with the virus, we need to get those businesses open.

    'So it is right we get the economy moving in that way but our message throughout and our message has been consistent — that the vaccine is key.'

    Meanwhile, Professor Semple told BBC Breakfast: 'We're going to have a miserable winter. I'm sorry, we're going to have a rough winter.'

    Asked whether restrictions would come back, he said: 'Possibly, and it may just be about reinforcing some common sense. 

    'It may be bringing back some mask-wearing in certain environments, but I don't foresee the lockdowns or the school suspensions that we've seen.'

    He also said there were some older people in hospital where the vaccine 'just can't help' them 'because they're older, and the immune system doesn't protect them'.

    Professor Semple said he felt the biggest unlocking was May 17.

    And he added it was 'quite realistic' that there could be up to 2,000 hospital admissions per day.

    He added: 'My big message to people now is sure we've weakened the link between community cases and hospital cases, but that link is not broken and it's the people that are not vaccinated that are still coming to harm.'

    Continuing in the cautious vein of Mr Johnson's press conference last night, Professor Semple said: 'There's no right time to unlock.'

    He said the language in the announcement 'was subtly different — rather than being totally reversible, there was a few caveats being thrown in there, suggesting that come winter time some measures may have to come back'.

    Professor Semple said he would continue to wear a face mask 'particularly in enclosed areas'.

    He added if people proceed cautiously 'we probably won't see' some of the numbers suggested in 'reasonable worst case scenarios', such as 200 deaths per day or 100,000 cases per day.

    Of the people currently going into hospital, he said 'they're nearly all unvaccinated, and what's surprising is that although they're not dying, they are suffering quite a lot of injuries, so we're seeing a lot of kidney injuries and lung injuries in these younger people.

    'So my concern now is not so much about death, although every death is a tragedy. 

    'My concern now is about otherwise healthy people that would normally be economically important and working and going about their daily lives, they're going to get damaged, they're going to get lung scarring and kidney disease. 

    'This is actually different to long Covid, this is acute Covid injury.'

    The coronavirus restrictions which will be removed from July 19

    The coronavirus restrictions which will be removed from July 19 Meanwhile, Professor Graham Medley, chairman of the SAGE modelling subgroup Spi-M, said the summer peak of coronavirus could last six weeks and heap a 'considerable burden' on the NHS.

    The chairman of the Sage modelling subgroup Spi-M told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'We've never seen a peak before that hasn't been controlled.

    What Covid 'freedoms' will mean for YOU: Do I have to wear a mask at the supermarket? Can I order at the bar? Will I need two jabs to go to a nightclub? And what about WFH? 

    With Freedom Day set to go ahead next Monday, businesses across England are preparing to wave farewell to most mandatory coronavirus restrictions.

    But the Prime Minister's cautious approach means the legal end to rules such as face masks and social distancing does not mean an immediate return to normality.

    For Britons are still expected to be asked by firms to wear masks in many walks of life such as while shopping in supermarkets and travelling on public transport.

    And venues such as nightclubs are being urged to require 'Covid certification' as a condition of entry, although some have already said they will not do this.

    The movement towards businesses deciding what is best for them will lead to a very different approach to the blanket rules the country has become used to. 

    And Sage member Professor Graham Medley said mask-wearing 'probably won't do any good' when the Government ends the legal requirement for the protection. 

    Here, MailOnline looks at what life will look like in England from next Monday:

     

    MASKS

    LAW: All laws mandating the wearing of masks will be scrapped

    ADVICE: The Prime Minister said people should continue to wear masks in confined spaces where they might meet people they would not ordinarily meet. Guidance published last night said: 'Government expects and recommends that people wear face coverings in crowded areas such as public transport.' 

    SOCIAL DISTANCING

    LAW: The two-metre rule is officially being lifted on 19 July, as well as the rule of six which restricts how many can gather together

    ADVICE: In fact, people are now being strongly advised to 'minimise the number, proximity and duration of social contacts'. Chris Whitty even suggested that people should avoid 'unnecessary meetings' - and said everyone should continue to abide by 'hands, face, space'.

     

    SUPERMARKETS  

    Sainsbury's - The chain told MailOnline it is 'working through the details of the government's announcement on the easing of restrictions and will keep our customers and colleagues updated'.

    Morrisons - The supermarket is believed to be waiting for the Government's plan and workplace guidance to be published, which will then reviewed in line with its own policies before any decision is made.

    Asda - The supermarket said on Twitter today that 'as per government guidance we will encourage shoppers to wear a mask, however this will be down to the individual as to whether or not they wish to wear a mask when shopping in store'.

    Co-op - The chain is yet to make a decision on masks, with a spokesman telling MailOnline it is 'reviewing our policy in light of the new Government announcement'.

    Iceland - An Iceland spokesman told MailOnline today that it was 'currently reviewing our policies in line with the latest updates from the Government on the easing of restrictions, and will continue to do so as further updates are provided'. It added: 'The safety of our customers and colleagues will continue to be our priority as restrictions are eased and we will update on any changes as we are able to do so.'

    Waitrose - The supermarket told MailOnline that bosses are 'awaiting Government guidance and we will work through that when we have it'. 

     

    Nandos - The chain told MailOnline that masks 'will be worn at the discretion of staff and customers' and hand sanitiser 'will remain on offer at every restaurant'. It said the rule of six will no longer apply 'so larger tables will be allowed' and it will start  accepting walk-ups again, but till safety screens and enhanced cleaning will remain.  

    Mitchells & Butlers - A spokesman told MailOnline that it looks forward to 'trading again without restrictions and at full capacity, allowing our business to continue its recovery from the devastating impacts of the pandemic.' He added: 'As we progress to trading without legal restrictions guest and team member safety will remain our top priority. We will confirm what our policies will be from July 19 in due course.'

    McDonalds - The chain told MailOnline it was not yet able to share any updates. 

     

    PUBS  

    Star Pubs - Bosses are waiting on the detailed government workplace guidance which is expected later today, and it will then be up to staff and customers to make their own decisions on face masks and socially distancing. Most of Star Pubs are leased and tenanted, which means it will effectively be up to each pub to decide.  

    Youngs - The chain told MailOnline today: 'We will no longer ask staff or customers to wear masks. We will leave it to them to decide for themselves to or not to wear masks. We will be lifting social distancing in pubs and operating in line with all the latest government guidance.' The pubs will also maintain additional cleaning protocols and other measures such as increased ventilation, with windows and doors open 'at every opportunity'. 

     

    TRANSPORT 

    Trains - The Rail Delivery Group, which represents UK train operators, such as Avanti West Coast, TransPennine Express and Southeastern, told MailOnline today that rail companies 'will ask people to follow the government guidance and, out of respect for others, wear face coverings if an indoor setting is busy'. A spokesman added that train travel is 'low risk, with the majority of carriages well ventilated by air conditioning systems or by doors and windows'. She added that as restrictions lift, they will continue carrying out extra cleaning and providing better information about how busy services are, so that 'passengers can travel with confidence'.

    Buses and coaches - The Confederation of Passenger Transport, which represents the bus and coach industry including National Express and Megabus, has called for clearer regulations from the Government but said in the absence of that, passengers' choices will be respected.  A spokesman told MailOnline: 'We expect that many people, especially in busy places, will follow the Prime Minister's call to continue to wear a face covering as a courtesy to others.' But they added that passengers 'will find it difficult to understand why the Prime Minister has singled out public transport as somewhere to wear a face covering when a range of other activities share its characteristics'. A spokesman continued: 'We now need to see clear guidance for operators and customers but, in the absence of regulations, it is important that we respect everyone's right to choose whether to wear a face covering. The industry is doing everything it can to ensure people can travel with confidence. Operators will continue to deliver enhanced cleaning regimes, ensure buses are well ventilated and provide tools such as apps to allow customers to see how busy their bus is and help plan their journey in advance.'

    National Express - A spokesman told MailOnline: 'We are all responsible for keeping each other safe. We are advising customers to follow the guidance for the relevant country they are travelling in. We will ask them to continue to be considerate of others and respect their personal choices.' 

    Transport for London - No decision announced yet for mask wearing on the Overground, Underground or bus services in London. TfL has not responded. Mayor Sadiq Khan has been considering a bid to force passengers to keep wearing masks. 

    Free Now - A spokesman for the car ride-hailing app told MailOnline: 'We are working with regulators to understand if there will still be industry-wide requirements on mask-wearing from Jul 19. Whilst we await this, we will recommend face masks to customers and drivers but give them both the choice on what to do, leaving them with the freedom to agree what is comfortable for them during a ride.'

    Foreign travel - Cross-Channel train firm Eurostar and airlines such as British Airways, easyJet and Ryanair will continue to require passengers to wear face coverings from July 19.'The intention is not to introduce a lockdown for this peak. Then we are going to see a natural peak and that may well be long and disseminated.

    'So even if we don't get up to very high numbers, the numbers that we get up to might last for several weeks, six weeks or so, in which case there's still a considerable burden on healthcare.

    'So, although we might not get over 2,000 admissions a day, if that lasts six weeks then that's a lot of people.'

    Speaking at the Downing Street press conference last night, Mr Johnson said: 'I cannot say this powerfully or emphatically enough — this pandemic is not over. 

    'This disease coronavirus continues to carry risks for you and for your family. We cannot simply revert instantly from Monday, July 19, to life as it was before Covid.' 

    Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty said families should still 'avoid unnecessary meetings' with other households with normal life returning only 'very slowly'.

    New Government guidance will say individuals are 'expected and recommended' to keep wearing masks in crowded places, while any return to offices this summer should only be 'gradual'.

    Ministers are also 'encouraging' the continued use of Covid certification at major events, saying the 'need for caution and restraint is more important than ever'. 

    Questions have been raised about whether the rules will be tougher in reality — as the government admits that train companies might well make face coverings a 'condition of carriage' for travel. 

    Mr Johnson said July 19 is the right time to ease coronavirus restrictions because of the 'natural firebreak' of the school holidays.

    The Prime Minister told the Downing Street press conference: 'We also know if we were to now delay this fourth step, for instance to September, or later, then we would be reopening as the weather gets colder and as the virus acquires a greater natural advantage and when schools are back.

    'We think now is the right moment to proceed when we have the natural firebreak of the school holidays in the next few days.'  

    Professor Whitty said going slowly through the next step was 'essential' to reduce the impact of the 'exit wave'.

    But Labour branded the unlocking, which was delayed from the original date of June 21 due to the emergence of the Delta variant, 'high risk'. 

    The Opposition pointed out that Israel — which also has a high rate of vaccination — was recently forced to row back on some of its reopening.

    And the BMA warned of 'potentially devastating consequences' of opening up next week, calling the decision 'irresponsible and possibly perilous'. 

    Dr Chaand Nagpaul, the BMA council chair, said that by going ahead on July 19, the Government was reneging on its promise to be led by the data and the impact on the NHS.

    He said scrapping restrictions while a significant proportion of the population was still not fully vaccinated, would allow the virus to 'retighten its grip', driving up infections and hospitalisations and putting more lives at risk.

    'It's irresponsible – and frankly perilous – that the Government has decided to press ahead with plans to lift the remaining Covid-19 restrictions on July 19,' he said.

    'The BMA has repeatedly warned of the rapidly rising infection rate and the crippling impact that Covid-related hospitalisations continue to have on the NHS, not only pushing staff to the brink of collapse but also driving up already lengthy waiting times for elective care.

    'The Prime Minister repeatedly emphasised the importance of a slow and cautious approach, but in reality the Government is throwing caution to the wind by scrapping all regulations in one fell swoop – with potentially devastating consequences.'

    No10's announcement came after SAGE yesterday signed off on the plans to open up next week after estimating there will be 10 times fewer deaths and half as many hospital admissions in the third wave compared to previous peaks. 

    There is a tenfold lower risk of dying from Covid now than in the second wave and a fourfold lower risk of being admitted to hospital because of the 'vaccine effect' and the fact younger people now make up the bulk of cases.

    For this reason the group — whose projections have guided No10 through the pandemic — expects the number of daily deaths to be 'considerably smaller' than the 1,200 recorded in January and anticipates hospital admissions will stay 'well below' the 4,000 in the winter. 

    The forecasts were revealed as part of a tranche of documents published today and submitted to ministers last week.

    While the central modelling points towards a much smaller epidemic than previously seen, SAGE admitted its calculations were highly uncertain and warned that the crisis could quickly jump to record levels if people suddenly abandon all personal precautions on July 19.

    SAGE said that the slower Britons return to normal life, the better, and have urged people to keep wearing masks in crowded areas, meet friends outside where possible and isolate if they feel ill or are 'pinged' by the NHS contact tracing app.  

    The advisory panel has also signed off on the July 19 date because delaying restrictions would only push the peak back into winter, when the NHS will be wrestling with seasonal pressures.

    Exactly when the third peak will happen is still not known but the experts believe it will be sometime in August at the earliest. They are bracing for more than 100,000 daily infections - which would dwarf the peak of 60,000 in January - and are expecting cases to stay 'extremely high' all summer. 

    'The priority should be to avoid a very rapid return to pre-pandemic behaviour which could lead to a peak in hospitalisations similar to, or possibly even higher than, previous peaks,' SAGE concluded. Daily deaths could surpass 500 in this scenario. 

    Experts are calling on people to continue wearing masks in crowded spaces but Professor Medley said individuals choosing to do so 'probably won't do any good' when the Government ends the legal requirement for the protection.

    He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'I personally will wear a mask to protect other people.

    'I think it's quite a reasonable thing to do. It doesn't have a huge imposition in terms of economic impact or in terms of freedom, and I think there is evidence to suggest it does good, but only if everybody does it.

    'So I think that, without the mandation, then we end up with a situation where even if the majority of people, let's say 70 per cent of people wear a mask, will that actually do any good because of the 30 per cent who don't? I think that is something which still needs to be determined and discussed.

    'I understand the Government's reluctance to actually mandate it. On the other hand, if it's not mandated it probably won't do any good.'

    Professor John Drury, social psychologist at the University of Sussex and a member of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviours (Spi-B), also told LBC radio of his concerns that the legal requirement to wear masks is being ended.

    'To drop legal enforcement does send a very strong signal, because when it is legally enforced it tells us that it's very important,' he said.

    'If you remember last year, it was around this time in the summer when masks were legally enforced, before that mask usage was going up and it shot up much more once it was legally enforced.'

    Asked whether there could be public 'clashes' over mask-wearing, he added: 'There was a paper published on this last year predicting this, because when you've got a situation which is slightly ambiguous — should we do it? should we not?

    'It's a personal choice, then you have got the possibility of people morally criticising others on each side.'

    Elsewhere, a World Health Organization special envoy on Covid warned it was 'too early to be talking about massive relaxation or freedom' despite the UK's rollout of vaccines.

    Regarding the Government's switch to personal responsibility, Dr David Nabarro told the Today programme: 'What does urging caution mean? It's important that everybody knows the best possible advice on how to prevent themselves being infected.

    'I accept that vaccination has changed the nature of the equation in the UK, but quite honestly from any point of view it's too early to be talking about massive relaxation or freedom when the outbreak curve is on such a sharp ascent.

    'Yes, relax, but don't have these mixed messages about what's going on. This dangerous virus hasn't gone away, its variants are coming back and are threatening those who have already been vaccinated — we have to take it seriously.' 

    Degrees of freedom: What the rules will say after July 19

    Degrees of freedom: What the rules will say after July 19

    Masks 'probably won't do any good' from July 19 because not enough people will wear them, top SAGE expert claims 

    Wearing a mask after Freedom Day 'probably won't do any good', one of the Government's top scientific advisers claimed today. 

    Professor Graham Medley accepted there was still a lack of evidence about how useful masks are but said is was his personal belief they only work when 'everybody' wears one.  

    From July 19, people in England will no longer be legally required to wear a face covering on public transport or in shops, restaurants and other indoor spaces.

    But ministers and scientific advisers are still encouraging people to don a mask in crowded spaces where the risk of Covid is higher.

    Professor Medley told the BBC Radio 4 Today Programme: 'I understand the Government's reluctance to actually mandate it. 

    'But on the other hand, if it's not mandated it probably won't do any good.'

    Professor Medley is the chairman of SAGE's modelling group SPI-B, whose forecasts pointed towards a smaller wave this autumn and gave ministers the confidence to press ahead with the final unlocking.

    He added: 'I personally will wear a mask to protect other people. I think it's quite a reasonable thing to do.

    It doesn't have a huge imposition in terms of economic impact or in terms of freedom, and I think there is evidence to suggest it does good, but only if everybody does it.'

    'So I think that, without the mandation, then we end up with a situation where even if the majority of people, let's say 70 per cent of people wear a mask, will that actually do any good because of the 30 per cent who don't? I think that is something which still needs to be determined and discussed.'

    There is enough evidence to show masks offer at least some protection against catching and spreading Covid but the extend of this protection is still unknown. 

    SAGE warns hospital admissions could soar beyond 12,000 a day with 200 people dying if Brits abandon social distancing and pour back into offices

    By CONNOR BOYD ASSISTANT HEALTH EDITOR AND LUKE ANDREW HEALTH REPORTER FOR MAILONLINE

    SAGE has signed off on plans to end Covid restrictions in England next week after estimating there will be 10 times fewer deaths and half as many hospital admissions in the third wave compared to previous peaks.

    Modelling by the expert group said it was realistic to expect between 100 to 200 daily fatalities and 1,000 to 2,000 hospital admissions at the worst of the current outbreak this autumn, following the unlocking on July 19.

    There is a tenfold lower risk of dying from Covid now than in the second wave and a fourfold lower risk of being admitted to hospital because of the 'vaccine effect' and the fact younger people now make up the bulk of cases.

    For this reason the group — whose projections have guided No10 through the pandemic — expects the number of daily deaths to be 'considerably smaller' than the 1,200 recorded in January and anticipates hospital admissions will stay 'well below' the 4,000 in the winter. 

    The forecasts were revealed as part of a tranche of documents published today and submitted to ministers last week. They will have given No10 the confidence to press ahead with Freedom Day next Monday. 

    While the central modelling points towards a much smaller epidemic than previously seen, SAGE admitted its calculations were highly uncertain and warned that the crisis could quickly spiral to record levels if people suddenly abandon all personal precautions on July 19.  

    This could lead to 4,800 admissions per day in a worst-case scenario. 'The priority should be to avoid a very rapid return to pre-pandemic behaviour which could lead to a peak in hospitalisations similar to, or possibly even higher than, previous peaks,' SAGE concluded. Daily deaths could surpass 500 in this scenario.

    According to a model by Imperial College London — headed by 'Professor Lockdown' Neil Ferguson, who was instrumental in the initial shutdown last spring — there could be 12,000 daily admissions if immunity from vaccines and previous infection fades quicker than expected.   

    SAGE said that the slower Britons return to normal life, the better, and have urged people to keep wearing masks in crowded areas, meet friends outside where possible and isolate if they feel ill or are 'pinged' by the NHS contact tracing app.  

    The advisory panel has also signed off on the July 19 date because delaying restrictions would only push the peak back into winter, when the NHS will be wrestling with seasonal pressures.

    Exactly when the third peak will happen is still not known but the experts believe it will be sometime in August at the earliest. They are bracing for more than 100,000 daily infections - which would dwarf the peak of 60,000 in January - and are expecting cases to stay 'extremely high' all summer.

    The group is advising the Government puts 'contingency plans' in place so that restrictions can be quickly rolled back if the NHS starts to buckle under the pressure of an influx of admissions. 

    COVID BED OCCUPANCY: SAGE modelled five scenarios after July based on how quickly people stopped social distancing and dumped other Covid measures. They found under the more pessimistic model when people quickly reverted to pre-pandemic levels of socialising there could be around 18,000 Covid patients in hospitals by September (yellow and purple lines). But in more optimistic scenarios when people were more cautious about socialising, they surged to a high of between 10,000 and 8,000 beds occupied in September

    COVID BED OCCUPANCY: SAGE modelled five scenarios after July based on how quickly people stopped social distancing and dumped other Covid measures. They found under the more pessimistic model when people quickly reverted to pre-pandemic levels of socialising there could be around 18,000 Covid patients in hospitals by September (yellow and purple lines). But in more optimistic scenarios when people were more cautious about socialising, they surged to a high of between 10,000 and

    The modelling, published by SAGE today but dated July 7, provides the first look at what letting Covid infect 100,000 people per day could look like after July 19.

    New health secretary Sajid Javid warned last week that the Government was prepared for six-digit infection numbers on the back of the unlocking, but did not reveal how many of these cases would fall severely ill or die.   

    The scale of the third wave remains highly uncertain, SAGE said, because it remains to be seen how people will behave when curbs are lifted.

    There are smaller uncertainties including how long vaccine immunity lasts and the true number of people who have not been for a jab yet - because population numbers are not yet available from the census earlier this year. 

    The central forecast of a maximum 200 daily deaths and 2,000 hospital admissions is based on people gradually edging back to normal over several months.

    It also works on the assumption that people continue to stay at home if they're sick, keep social contacts limited, wear masks in crowded areas and return to offices in a phased manner. 

    SAGE concluded: 'The priority should be to avoid a very rapid return to pre-pandemic behaviour which could lead to a peak in hospitalisations similar to, or possibly even higher than, previous peaks.

    'The mechanism by which this gradual change to more mixing is achieved is much less important than the fact it is gradual.' 

    The expert group called for ministers to put backup plans in place in case the NHS starts to become overwhelmed this winter. It said that it will become clear within the first few weeks after July 19 whether this will be likely. 

    Experts will be keeping an eye on ICU admissions, ventilator capacity and the length of hospital stay rather than solely on the number of admissions.  

    Speaking at tonight's Downing Street press conference, Professor Chris Whitty warned that the country will face an 'exit wave' of coronavirus infections whenever restrictions are lifted.

    He said there is no 'ideal date' for ending lockdown and there will be an increase in hospital admissions and deaths when it happens. However Prof Whitty said it is essential to proceed 'steadily and cautiously' to reduce the numbers of people becoming seriously ill.

    'There is extremely wide agreement that whenever we go through the next step, there is going to be what's called an exit wave – there will be a wave associated with that,' he said.

    'The slower we take it, the fewer people will have Covid, the smaller the peak will be, and the smaller the number of people who go into hospital and die.' 

    Professor Whitty said there was 'no clear evidence' a further delay to lockdown lifting would make a difference to overall numbers.

    'There is no such thing as an ideal date – all the possible dates have downsides,' he said. 'If we could go at this point in time, we go at a point when there are still some people being vaccinated, but we are not going at a point when schools are just coming back, and we're not going at a point where we're going into autumn and winter.

    'The modelling studies that have been done on this largely show that all dates essentially tend to lead to broadly similar outcomes – different models come to very slightly different conclusions.'

    SAGE's three modelling teams, from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Imperial College London and Warwick University, looked at various ways the outbreak could change after next week. 

    They considered variables – such as how many people accept a vaccine, how quickly people return to normal and the number of infections at the peak – to come to best-case, worst-case and central scenarios. 

    The modelling showed: 

    Imperial College London: Hospital admissions on par with second peak but deaths 'substantially' lower  

    The team at Imperial said there could be more than 30,000 Covid deaths and 260,000 hospital admissions with the virus over the next year. For comparison, there were about 80,000 total deaths in the second wave and 300,000 admissions. 

    Imperial's central estimate assumes that people will continue to wear face coverings, self-isolate and keep good hand hygiene measures past the July 19 unlocking. 

    But the team, led by Professor Neil Ferguson, said it was possible the country could suffer 75,500 additional deaths and as many as 546,000 hospitalisations in a more pessimistic scenario.  

    In a worst-case scenario daily hospitalisations could soar beyond 12,000, according to modelling by Imperial College London, headed by 'Professor Lockdown' Neil Ferguson, who was instrumental in the initial shutdown last spring. This model assumed that people who are unvaccinated and were previously infected with the Kent variant are still susceptible to catching the Indian strain, which would scupper hopes that Britain can get to herd immunity through a combination of natural infections and vaccinations this winter

    In a worst-case scenario daily hospitalisations could soar beyond 12,000, according to modelling by Imperial College London, headed by 'Professor Lockdown' Neil Ferguson, who was instrumental in the initial shutdown last spring. This model assumed that people who are unvaccinated and were previously infected with the Kent variant are still susceptible to catching the Indian strain, which would scupper hopes that Britain can get to herd immunity through a combination of natural infections and vaccinations this winter

    This assumed low vaccine uptake in younger populations and high numbers of 'reinfections', which would scupper hopes of achieving herd immunity this winter through vaccination in the elderly population and natural infection in the young.

    In their most optimistic scenario, in which people were extremely prudent with their behaviour, Imperial said there would be just 14,000 more deaths from the virus by this time next year, and 112,500 hospitalisations.  

    But, like the other modelling teams, Imperial did not include the effect of the planned booster programme in autumn in their calculations, which has the potential to reduce the number of people falling severely ill.

    Scientists are not yet clear how long immunity from vaccines lasts because the jabs have never been rolled out before, but early data suggests it lasts at least six months in the 'majority' of cases.  

    A booster vaccine programme has already been signed off by the Government's scientific advisers, who said a third shot may restore peak immunity.  

    LSHTM: Outbreak will be smaller than previous waves even in worst case

    Britain's third wave will be smaller than previous peaks even in the most pessimistic scenarios, researchers at LSHTM suggested.

    The models looked at a number of factors that could influence the outbreak, including vaccine uptake, duration of immunity and how long people take personal social precautions. 

    The team found that in all scenarios the third wave of infections will peak in August, but the degree to which hospital admissions and deaths follow depends on the above variables.

    They warned that if people suddenly dropped all social distancing rules by 60 per cent and immunity started to fade within 12 months then there could be 600 deaths per day in winter and 3,500 admissions.   

    The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine looked at two scenarios. In scenario 1 (red) it was assumed that medium levels of mobility changes occur after roadmap Step 4; a 20% reduction in self-protective measures; no waning of natural and vaccine induced immunity; and optimistic assumptions on vaccine effectiveness against the Delta variant. Scenario 2 (blue) considers: high levels of mobility changes occurring after roadmap Step 4; a 60% reduction in self-protective measures; 15% of individuals with natural and vaccine induced immunity waning after 1 year; and vaccines being 90-plus per cent effective at reducing hospitalisations from the Delta strain

    The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine looked at two scenarios. In scenario 1 (red) it was assumed that medium levels of mobility changes occur after roadmap Step 4; a 20% reduction in self-protective measures; no waning of natural and vaccine induced immunity; and optimistic assumptions on vaccine effectiveness against the Delta variant. Scenario 2 (blue) considers: high levels of mobility changes occurring after roadmap Step 4; a 60% reduction in self-protective measures; 15% of individuals with natural and vaccine induced immunity waning after 1 year; and vaccines being 90-plus per cent effective at reducing hospitalisations from the Delta strain

    In the team's most realistic scenario — where immunity from jabs does not wane but social contact rises gradually between groups — they suggest there could be fewer than 1,000 hospital admissions per day and fewer than 200 deaths. 

    Easings from previous lockdowns have shown mixing between Britons has only risen gradually, and not leaped upwards to pre-March 2020 levels. 

    Warwick University: 4,000 hospital admissions a day by August

    Warwick University scientists found there could be 4,000 Covid hospitalisations a day this winter in a worst-case scenario, rising to potentially 7,000.  

    A more realistic scenario proposed by the modellers would see hospitalisations surge to 2,000 a day — a five-fold increase on the current level but half the more than 4,000 recorded during the second wave, and 500 daily deaths.

    They say even this scenario would place a 'heavy burden' on the NHS which is battling through a backlog of patients.

    In their most optimistic forecast,  peak daily hospital admissions could peak at around 700 a day and deaths 100. But in order to achieve this, people would need to be very cautious with their social interactions for another five months. 

    Warwick University scientists advising SAGE predict there could be up to 7,000 Covid hospitalisations a day during the third wave, spiralling above the peak of the second wave (shown in the upper confidence interval in purple). A more realistic scenario proposed by the modellers would see hospitalisations surge to 2,000 a day — a five-fold increase on the current level but half the more than 4,000 recorded during the second wave. They say this would place a 'heavy burden' on the NHS which is battling through a backlog of patients

    Warwick University scientists advising SAGE predict there could be up to 7,000 Covid hospitalisations a day during the third wave, spiralling above the peak of the second wave (shown in the upper confidence interval in purple). A more realistic scenario proposed by the modellers would see hospitalisations surge to 2,000 a day — a five-fold increase on the current level but half the more than 4,000 recorded during the second wave. They say this would place a 'heavy burden' on the NHS which is battling through a backlog of patients

    Warwick scientists also suggest there may be a fourth wave over the autumn and winter, as the start of the new school term drives up transmission and cases. 

    All three scenarios assumed that 33 per cent of Britons will still be susceptible to Covid by July 19, although this is expected to be an overestimate because of the vaccine rollout and natural immunity.

    Official figures suggest 90 per cent of the population now have some immunity against Covid, based on the Office for National Statistics' antibody study.  

    The Warwick team concluded: 'Even if all controls are lifted on 19 July 2021, it is unlikely that the entire population will return to pre-Covid mixing patterns; many individuals are likely to still avoid crowds and limit their risky behaviours.

    'Seasonality and slow decline could lead to a fourth wave in the winter of 2021 or early spring 2022. but very uncertain due to waning immunity, seasonality and possible boosters.'

No comments:

Powered by Blogger.