Britain CANNOT be sure jihadi bride Shamima Begum won't be a terror threat when she returns to UK, admits her family's OWN lawyer - but she faces arrest moments after touching down
The lawyer representing the family of jihadi bride Shamima Begum today made the extraordinary admission that 'nobody can be sure' if she is still a terror threat to Britain - but insisted that she should be allowed to return to the UK anyway.
Tasnime Akunjee also declared that a 'lack of technology' in the Syrian camp where Begum is living means she cannot fairly fight for her British passport to be returned.
It came as Begum was pictured wearing jeans, a shirt and a blue hat while walking through a Syrian refugee camp after winning a bombshell Court of Appeal victory that could see her back in the country within weeks. When she does return to the UK, Begum is likely to be arrested and questioned before being charged with terror-related offences.
Speaking to ITV's Good Morning Britain Mr Akunjee was asked if she could be a terror threat or groom others following her extremist past and said: 'No one can be sure including her family that that won't happen - but that is pure speculation'.
Macer Gifford, British former currency trader who travelled to Syria to fight with the Kurdish YPG militia against the Islamic State, also appeared on the show and said Begum must face trial in Syria or Iraq.
He said: 'I do not trust the British legal system to get this right. just 1 in 10 jihadis who have come back to Britain find themselves in court. 'My fear is that Shamima Begum will come back to the UK and get a slap on the wrist and she'll be out within 2 years. Why can't they [ISIS members] stand trial in Syria and Iraq where they committed these crimes?'


Tasnime Akunjee, a lawyer representing the family of Shamima Begum. admits they cannot be sure if she is a threat to Britain but insists she should return to the UK to win back her passport

Macer Gifford, British former currency trader who travelled to Syria to fight with the Kurdish YPG militia against the Islamic State said he fears Begum will come back to the UK and only 'get a slap on the wrist'
Begum, who left to join IS five years ago when she was 15, had been stripped of her British citizenship after she was found, nine months pregnant, in a Syrian refugee camp in February last year, and was previously pictured wearing a black burka.
But yesterday she won a legal challenge after judges ruled she had not been granted a 'fair and effective' appeal. They said she should be allowed to return for a fresh hearing in a bid to overturn the Home Office's decision. Yesterday, Downing Street said it was 'bitterly disappointed' by the ruling and Sajid Javid, the former home secretary who oversaw the removal of her citizenship, said he was 'deeply concerned'.
MPs and victims of Islamic State atrocities reacted furiously after three Court of Appeal judges said she could return here from a refugee camp in Syria.
Tory MP Andrew Bridgen was left furious by yesterday's ruling saying it risked a flood of jihadis returning. He told MailOnline: 'It opens the door for all her fellow jihadi brides to return to Britain – and potentially their terrorist partners too.
'Most Brits will rightly think that when you swear allegiance to another country that declares war on Britain, that you have given up all the rights and protections and privileges of your British citizenship. After today's ruling it appears you have not'.

Appeal: Begum challenged the decision made by then Home Secretary Sajid Javid saying she now feared for her life. Her third child Jarrah, pictured in her arms, died at three weeks old


Tooba Gonda (left), a former AK-47-wielding ISIS bride who groomed others online and bragged online about her 'real freedom' in Syria before caliphate collapsed. Jihadi bride Amira Abase (right) from Bethnal Green is rumoured to have been killed in an air strike but there are reports that Begum's schoolfriend could still alive

Former bouncy castle salesman Siddhartha Dhar, 36, known as jihadi Sid, could be among the male jihadis looking to get back to Britain following today's ruling

Jihadi bride Shamima Begum has been pictured today wearing jeans, a shirt and a blue hat as she walked through a Syrian refugee camp



'Hungry' Hamza Parvez, Aseel Muthana, and 'Jihadi Jack' Letts have also been stripped of their British citizenshipThese include Tooba Gondal, a former AK-47-wielding ISIS bride who groomed others online and bragged online about her 'real freedom' in Syria before the caliphate collapsed.
She is also in the Al Hol camp with Begum and has begged to come back to the UK because of 'dire conditions' there.
Counter- terror experts also warned last night that the decision to let Begum back into the UK could have dire implications for national security.
Dr Alan Mendoza, executive director of the counter-terror think-tank the Henry Jackson Society, said: 'The deeply troubling implication of this judgment is that up to 150 terrorists are now legally entitled to enter the UK in order to appeal the decision in their case.
'This decision could have dramatic repercussions for our entire counter-terror strategy.'
British jihadi fighters believed to be alive including former bouncy castle salesman turned alleged executioner Siddhartha Dhar, 36, 'Jihadi Jack' Letts, ISIS grave digger Shahan Choudhury, fast food addict 'Hungry' Hamza Parvez and Cardiff ice cream salesman Aseel Muthana may also try to seize on Begum's legal victory.
UK civil rights groups including Liberty helped launch Begum's legal battle in Britain and today the Court of Appeal found she could not have an 'effective' appeal against the decision by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) in February while she is out of the country - and said letting her back into the UK 'outweighed national security concerns'.
The three judges, led by Lord Justice Flaux, said: 'The Court concludes that Ms Begum's appeal to the Court of Appeal should be allowed, so that she can have leave to enter the UK in order for there to be a fair and effective appeal before SIAC'.
However, sympathisers of the jihadi bride could risk up to 14 years in jail if they attempt to help her come back. A government source revealed a 'simulation' was carried out last year by intelligence experts at the Home Office, shortly after Begum was found in a Syrian refugee camp.
It concluded that anyone who assisted her return could be arrested under Section 17 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
The law sets out how it is a crime to 'fund' terrorism and carries a jail term of up to 14 years. Funding could involve money or property –for example, a plane ticket.
Lord Carlile, the leading QC and former terror tsar, confirmed it had potential to be a viable tactic. 'That is quite possible. I don't think the Government is under any obligation to take extraordinary steps to bring her back.'
Richard Walton, former head of Scotland Yard's Counter-Terrorism Command, warned it may not be easy to hold Begum behind bars. He said: 'She would likely be arrested and charged with terrorism offences but the evidence against her could be weak.
'If released, she would present an on-going threat and would need to be subject to rigorous monitoring costing the state hundreds of thousands of pounds over months and years.'
Mother-of-three Begum, 20, whose children with Dutch jihadi husband Yago Riedijk all died, is still in the Al Hol camp in northern Syria but could be heading back to Britain within weeks after today's landmark ruling.
Her first two children, a one-year-old girl and a three-month-old boy, died in the caliphate after becoming sick and malnourished, while her third child Jarrah died shortly after he was born in the camp where his mother still lives.
The Government is 'bitterly disappointed' by the court's ruling in the Shamima Begum case, Downing Street said.
The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'The Government's priority is maintaining our national security, and decisions to deprive individuals of their citizenship are not taken lightly.
'We will always ensure the safety and security of the UK and will not allow anything to jeopardise this.'
Sajid Javid, who made the decision while Home Secretary, tweeted he was 'deeply concerned' by the judgment.
He said he respected the court and would limit how much he said about the case, but that there were important principles at stake.
'Any restrictions of rights and freedoms faced by Ms Begum are a direct consequence of the actions she has taken, in violation of both government guidance and common morality,' he said.
'It is not clear to me why an appeal could not be made abroad using modern technology.
'However, this is not solely a matter of justice. It is also a matter of national security.'
Reg Henning, whose brother Alan was beheaded by IS in 2013 after helping with an aid convoy in Syria, said: 'She shouldn't be allowed in – she's made her bed out there. I'm concerned the case could lead to others like her also being allowed back. If they let one in, they'll all come back.'
The Home Office says it will appeal the Begum ruling to the Supreme Court in attempt to stop her entering the UK. But if Priti Patel's department loses it faces the embarrassing prospect of an extremist they claim poses a risk to the country's safety being allowed back to the UK - and opens the door to other jihadi brides and their extremist partners flooding back to Britain.
It said in a statement: 'This is a very disappointing decision by the Court. We will now apply for permission to appeal this judgment, and to stay its effects pending any onward appeal. The Government's top priority remains maintaining our national security and keeping the public safe'.
The Court of Appeal has acknowledged that letting her back into the country raises 'national security concerns' but said 'the only way in which she can have a fair and effective appeal before SIAC is for Ms Begum to be permitted to come into the UK to pursue that appeal'. The judgment added: 'Fairness and justice must, on the facts of this case, outweigh the national security concerns, so that the LTE (leave to enter the UK) appeals should be allowed'.
If Begum returns to Britain for the citizenship case she will either win and be handed back her British passport, or lose and face deportation with the process expected to run into 2021.
Daniel Furner of Birnberg Peirce Solicitors, representing Begum, said in a statement after the decision: 'The Court's judgment today is an important reminder that fairness and the rule of law remain cornerstones of the British legal system, and that they set the legal limits within which the Home Secretary may act.
'Justice cannot be defeated, or indefinitely delayed, because a case is difficult or because national security is engaged. Fundamental rights are not extinguished because a person is abroad, or because the allegations against them are serious.
'As important as the re‐iteration of those centuries' old principles was the Court's unqualified rejection of the Home Secretary's argument that the impediments to Ms Begum's participation in her appeal were of her own making. As the Court said, approaching the case on that basis risks putting the cart before the horse.
Ms Begum has never had a fair opportunity to give her side of the story. The Court itself noted the 'obvious' difference between interviews given to journalists, and instructions provided to a solicitor in court proceedings.
Ms Begum is not afraid of facing British justice, she welcomes it. But the stripping of her citizenship without a chance to clear her name is not justice, it is the opposite.'
Civil liberties groups have hailed today's decision.
Mohammed Shafiq, CEO of the Ramadhan Foundation, said: 'The decision of the Court of Appeal to allow Shamima Begum to return to the UK is the right decision and British citizens should welcome it.
'This is a great victory for all those that believe in a equal society and oppose discrimination in applying citizenship rules. I hope she returns to the UK and is held to account for her alleged crimes like any other British citizen'.
Maya Foa, director of not-for-profit organisation Reprieve, which is calling for all Britons held in camps in north-east Syria to be repatriated to the UK, said after the Shamima Begum ruling: 'It was always unsafe and unjust to make Brits in Syria someone else's problem.
'The Government must urgently revisit its policy and repatriate the tiny number of remaining British families, to face British justice wherever there are charges to answer'.


Jihadi bride Shamima Begum, 20, is desperate to return to Britain five years after she voluntarily left to join ISIS in Syria - her British citizenship was revoked when she was found in a refugee camp after the caliphate fell last year
No comments: